标签归档 阿拉 后花园 上海

Most people’s evaluation of the Eleventh Generation is that the appearance has become ugly. The air intake grille without chrome trim and the flat air intake grille make this car look a little stingy. In addition, from the actual sales results, although the 11th generation Accord can still get the monthly delivery volume of 1W+, compared with the 10th generation Accord, the sales volume has dropped significantly, which is still based on the starting price of bare car of 114,800 yuan after its discount.

But then again, from my personal aesthetic point of view, in fact, the eleventh accord is not ugly after a long time, especially the eleventh accord with pure black color scheme and starry blue version. Moreover, for the 2025 Accord launched some time ago, the appearance of the new model has been slightly adjusted, and the intelligence of the high-profile model has also been upgraded. So, let’s take a look at the 2025 11th generation Accord to see how its products perform.

First of all, from the power point of view, the 2025 Accord only launched the fuel version, but compared with the past, it is still equipped with the Earth Dream engine with a maximum horsepower of 192 horsepower and the CVT continuously variable gearbox. However, it has to be said that it is really rare for a 1.5T engine to burst out with 192 horsepower, and at the same time, in the acceleration test of 0-100km/h, it also makes the zero-acceleration performance of this medium-sized car come to 8.6 seconds.

But unfortunately, among competing products of the same level with similar prices, they all provide 2.0T engines with higher horsepower and larger displacement, which can reduce the acceleration time from zero to eight seconds, and at the same time take into account good fuel economy. On the other hand, this 1.5T power system of Honda Accord, in the case of relatively small displacement, still needs the user to bear the comprehensive fuel consumption of about 8.2L per 100 kilometers, but fortunately, Honda Accord does not need to add 95.

Secondly, in terms of design, the 11th-generation Accord of the 2025 model still adopts a hexagonal air intake grille, and the narrow light groups on both sides are matched with a flat mesh, which also makes the whole front face of the car look flatter. At the same time, it is more youthful and fashionable without chrome trim, but it also lacks some exquisite atmosphere.

After coming to the side of the car, both the old eleven-generation Accord and the 2025 eleven-generation Accord provided different styles of wheel hub shapes. Like the previous generation Accord, they all provide a more elegant and sporty multi-spoke rim for the premium version and above. For the low-profile version of the Accord, pure aluminum alloy color matching is adopted. Although the multi-spoke petal wheel hub is fashionable, the solid aluminum alloy wheel hub looks really cheap.

However, for the 11th generation Accord of the 2025 model, the wheel hub of the low-profile model has been upgraded. As shown in the figure, the bright black painted wheel rim makes the low-profile Accord look a bit delicate, and the blackened style can also create a good sense of fashion and sports.

At the rear of the car body, the penetrating taillight with slim shape and blackened surface is the biggest highlight of the 11th Accord in appearance. Compared with the 10-generation Accord, the tail of the 11-generation Accord can highlight the popular sense of modern technology and fashion movement, and it also has a good visual effect after lighting at night.

After arriving in the car, the 2025 Accord still continues Honda’s latest family-style design, the 12.3-inch suspended central control panel, and the penetrating honeycomb decorative strip given by the air conditioning outlet, all of which can enhance the young fashion sense of the front row. In addition, the knob adjustment button located below the central control panel is also worth mentioning, because it can not only display a simple digital clock, but also replace the LED display screen on its surface with air conditioning control area through the car screen, as well as user-defined functions. In addition, in terms of intelligent configuration, the flagship version of the 2025 Accord has added DOW opening warning, as well as automatic access to the ramp and, at the same time, the Honda CONNECT version 4.0 will also bring a better car experience.

Edit summary

To sum up, the 11th generation Accord with blackened wheels has indeed brought more youthful sports atmosphere to the basic design. Compared with the previous 11th generation Accord with low-profile version, the 2025 Accord with bright black wheels not only looks more classy, but also conforms to the young and fashionable design language of the 11th generation Accord. In addition to optimizing the low-profile models, the high-profile version also upgraded Honda’s latest smart driving technology, which improved the daily travel experience of users to some extent. So at the end, what do you think of the performance of the 2025 Eleventh Accord? Please leave a message in the comments section.

　　Republican Attorneys General in two states of the United States filed a lawsuit accusing Biden’s government of interfering with social media content. In response to the lawsuit, a federal judge in the United States issued an injunction prohibiting major agencies and officials of Biden’s government from meeting and communicating with social media companies on "protected speech".

　　The case may have a profound impact on the First Amendment, marking a key turning point in the partisan struggle over social media speech in the United States for several years, which may have a major impact on technology companies.

　　On July 4, local time, a federal judge in the United States banned major agencies and officials of Biden’s government from meeting and communicating with social media companies on "protected speech." This is an unconventional preliminary injunction involving an ongoing case that may have a far-reaching impact on the First Amendment.

　　The media is worried that this move by the judge appointed by former US President Trump may ruin years of efforts to strengthen coordination between the government and social media companies. For more than a decade, the US federal government has been trying to cooperate with social media companies to solve criminal activities, including child sexual abuse images and terrorism.

　　This ruling may have a major impact on technology companies, because technology companies communicate with government officials regularly, especially during emergencies such as elections and epidemics. As American courts are increasingly forced to weigh such issues, it may subvert the legal norms governing online speech for decades.

　　The White House retorts that social media platforms should consider the impact on the American people.

　　The ban was in response to lawsuits filed by Republican attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, who claimed that government officials had gone too far in encouraging social media companies to deal with posts that might cause people to hesitate to get vaccinated or subvert elections during the epidemic. Legal experts believe that these cases may eventually be submitted to the Supreme Court.

　　In the past five years, when the United States accused Russia of spreading false information during the 2016 election, the US federal government responded to the increasing election intervention and voter repression, and the coordination and communication between government officials and technology companies have been strengthened. During the COVID-19 epidemic, public health officials often communicated with social media companies, because false information about viruses and vaccines spread on social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Evelyn Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School, told Washington post: "The scope of the ban is extremely broad, obviously to prevent any form of contact between government actors and social media platforms."

　　Judge Terry A. Doughty has not yet made a final ruling on the case, but when he issued the injunction, he said that he might side with the Republican Attorney General and think that Biden’s government violated the First Amendment.

　　The judge’s order restricted some executive agencies in the federal government, including the Ministry of Justice, the the State Council, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and named more than a dozen officials, including Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, and Jen Easterly, head of the Cyber Security and Infrastructure Security Bureau.

　　In addition to restricting the communication between the government and technology companies, Doughty also prohibited these institutions and officials from cooperating, coordinating and establishing partnerships with major academic groups focusing on social media, including the Election Integrity Partnership, the researchers’ alliance led by the Internet Observatory of Stanford University and the Informed Public Center of Washington University.

　　In the order, the judge made some exceptions to the communication between government officials and companies, including warning of national security threats, criminal activities or suppressing voters. Duke said that the exemption list highlighted the thorny issues in the case, but the order lacked clear guidance on "where is the boundary".

　　A White House official said that the Justice Department "is reviewing the court’s injunction and will evaluate its options in this case". The official said: "This government advocates taking responsible actions to protect public health, safety and security in the face of challenges such as deadly epidemics and foreign attacks on our elections." "Our consistent view remains that social media platforms have an important responsibility to consider the impact of their platforms on the American people, but to make independent choices about the information they provide."

　　Google, one of the companies named in the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Meta, Facebook’s parent company, declined to comment, and Twitter did not respond to requests for comment.

　　Republican victory

　　The lawsuit marks a key turning point in the partisan struggle over social media speech in the United States for several years. For years, Republicans have believed that the policies of social media companies to deal with false information related to elections and public health have led to the censorship of their political views. At the same time, Democrats argue that these companies have not done enough to regulate their services to ensure that they do not undermine democracy.

　　What is unusual about this lawsuit is that it is not aimed at technology companies, because technology companies claim that they have the First Amendment right to determine the content displayed on the website, but at the role of the federal government in this process. This is the most successful legal effort in this regard so far.

　　The Republican state attorney general believes that Biden’s administration threatened to take legal action against technology companies when the comments on the platform caused controversy, which violated the First Amendment. They cited the Biden administration’s threat to take anti-monopoly actions against these companies or to revoke Section 230, which is a legal shield to protect technology giants from lawsuits. (For details, please refer to 澎湃 Technology Report "The US Supreme Court opens the trial of the fate of big technology companies: whether to cancel the 27-year Internet" umbrella "? 》）

　　The Trump administration has also put forward similar arguments in its struggle with social media companies. In 2020, Trump signed an executive order instructing the Federal Communications Commission to reconsider the scope of Section 230. In the same week that the order was issued, Twitter put a fact check tag on Trump’s two tweets.

　　According to reports, this case is based on tens of thousands of communications between Biden government officials and social media companies, including emails and text messages, which mainly occurred between 2020 and 2021. The attorney general of the above-mentioned state believes that from 2017, four years before Biden became president, internal government officials began to lay the foundation for a "systematic movement" to control social media speech.

　　However, although Biden and dozens of officials from 11 government agencies were listed as defendants in the lawsuit, some examples cited occurred during Trump’s administration.

　　Since the acquisition of Twitter last year, elon musk has been echoing the views of the Republican Party, releasing internal company documents to selected journalists, implying that Twitter colluded with government officials. Although this is far from being confirmed, some documents disclosed by Musk eventually appeared in the arguments of the lawsuit.

　　Defendants, social media companies and experts who study false information say there is no evidence that the government systematically censors individuals in violation of the First Amendment. David Rand, an expert on misinformation at MIT, told The New York Times that his understanding is that the government has limited influence on how social media platforms handle misinformation.

　　Jamir Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute of Columbia University, said: "The government cannot violate the First Amendment simply by interacting with the platform on its content review and policy." "If this is what the court said, then this is a rather radical proposition that is not supported by case law."

　　Xinhua News Agency, Tokyo, July 23rd Japan’s nuclear regulatory agency, the Atomic Energy Regulatory Commission, held a meeting on the 22nd, officially approving the plan of Tokyo Electric Power Company (hereinafter referred to as TEPCO) to discharge nuclear polluted water into the sea at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. According to this plan, TEPCO will start to discharge nuclear polluted water next spring if the local government agrees again.

　　Analysts pointed out that in April last year, the Japanese government officially decided to discharge nuclear polluted water into the Pacific Ocean despite strong opposition at home and abroad. Over the past year or so, despite the rising opposition at home and abroad, the Japanese side turned a deaf ear and pushed forward the discharge of nuclear polluted water into the sea, which is extremely irresponsible and will cause serious harm to the global marine environment.

　　This is the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan, which was shot on April 13th, 2021. (Xinhua News Agency/Kyodo News Agency)

　　Push hard

　　In April this year, Japan Atomic Energy Regulatory Commission ignored domestic and international objections and doubts, and "generally agreed" to TEPCO’s emission plan, forming a draft "review book". After confirming the draft of the "review book" in May, the Committee said that the draft was "no problem" and entered the public consultation session.

　　According to reports, 670 of the more than 1,200 opinions collected publicly are technical opinions, including concerns about the determination of the concentration of nuclear contaminated water and the earthquake resistance of equipment. Despite this, after discussing the opinions collected on the 22nd, the Atomic Energy Regulatory Commission said that TEPCO’s response was "appropriate" and approved its plan to discharge nuclear polluted water into the sea.

　　After the Fukushima nuclear accident in March, 2011, a large amount of nuclear polluted water was produced to continuously cool the nuclear reactor whose core melted. TEPCO has prepared about 1,000 water storage tanks for storing nuclear contaminated water at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. With the available capacity of water storage tanks getting less and less, the Japanese government held a cabinet meeting in April last year and formally decided to filter and dilute these nuclear polluted water and discharge it into the sea.

This is the nuclear sewage storage tank of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, Japan, which was photographed on February 13, 2021. (Xinhua News Agency/Kyodo News Agency)

　　Analysts pointed out that although the emission plan was nominally formulated by TEPCO, in fact, it could not be completed without the participation and support of the Japanese government.

　　According to Japanese media reports, in addition to promoting the approval of emission plans, Japan is also stepping up the construction of sea-discharge pipelines. At the end of April this year, TEPCO started the construction of the outlet of the submarine tunnel for discharging nuclear polluted water, with the goal of completing related projects in April 2023.

　　make irresponsible remarks

　　At present, all parties are generally concerned about the impact of Japan’s discharge of nuclear polluted water on the marine environment and people’s health in countries along the Pacific Ocean. At the same time, questions are raised about the legitimacy of the nuclear polluted water discharge scheme, the reliability of Japanese data, the effectiveness of purification devices and the controllability of environmental impact. Grossi, Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, pointed out in an interview last year that Japanese nuclear waste water discharged into the Pacific Ocean should not cause environmental damage.

　　The International Atomic Energy Agency set up a technical working group to visit and evaluate Japan twice. So far, it has not reached a conclusive opinion on Japan’s sea discharge plan, and at the same time, it has put forward many clarification requirements and improvement opinions. China and Russia submitted a joint technical questionnaire to the Japanese side, and they still haven’t received feedback from the Japanese side. Not long ago, the leaders’ meeting and foreign ministers’ meeting of the Pacific Island Forum also expressed serious concern about related issues.

　　In this regard, the Japanese side not only deliberately avoided these questions, but also made irresponsible remarks and tried to cover up the harm. The Japanese side claimed that before the Fukushima nuclear polluted water was discharged into the sea, it had to be filtered by "Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment" (ALPS) to remove more than 60 radioactive substances. Tritium, which is difficult to be removed by the equipment, will be diluted to a concentration far lower than the Japanese national standard and discharged into the sea. The Japanese side also confuses the concept and confuses nuclear polluted water with waste water, saying that waste water discharged from nuclear power plants all over the world contains tritium, and it is safe to dilute it and discharge it into the sea.

　　In fact, Fukushima nuclear contaminated water is not tritium-containing wastewater discharged during the normal operation of nuclear power plants, and the radioactive substances contained in it are extremely complex, so it is doubtful whether it can be effectively removed. Given that the Japanese government and TEPCO have many dishonest records in dealing with the Fukushima nuclear accident, their statements are unconvincing.

　　Japanese media have found out that there are many radioactive substances in Fukushima nuclear polluted water beyond the standard except tritium. TEPCO also admitted that more than 70% of the nuclear polluted water treated by ALPS does not meet the discharge standards and needs to be filtered again.

　　strongly oppose

　　There have been a lot of doubts and objections in Japan and the international community about Japan’s plan to discharge nuclear polluted water into the sea. The statement made by the Japan Atomic Energy Regulatory Commission on the 22nd once again aroused serious concern, and all parties urged Japan to cancel the wrong decision to discharge nuclear polluted water into the sea.

On April 13, 2021, protesters opposed the discharge of Fukushima nuclear polluted water into the sea outside the Prime Minister’s residence in Tokyo, Japan. (Photo by Xinhua News Agency reporter Du Yiyi)

　　People from Tokyo, Chiba and Fukushima held protests that day. The people who participated in the event said that the decision of the Atomic Energy Regulatory Commission is related to the future of Fukushima and the marine environment, but it is very irresponsible to make such an important decision without fully informing the Japanese people. Some people also said that they are resolutely opposed to discharging nuclear polluted water into the sea, and Japan can no longer pollute the ocean and pollute the earth.

　　The National Federation of Fishery Associations of Japan held a meeting in Tokyo a few days ago and unanimously adopted a special resolution of "reaffirming the position of resolutely opposing the discharge of nuclear polluted water from Fukushima into the sea". This is the third time that the group has passed a resolution against the discharge of Fukushima nuclear polluted water into the sea.

　　Japan’s irresponsible behavior triggered strong opposition from neighboring countries. The South Korean government said on the 22nd that it was worried about the Japanese nuclear regulatory agency’s approval of discharging pollutants into the sea, and it would take countermeasures. At the same time, South Korea will also strengthen cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and strengthen the detection of domestic marine environmental radiation.

　　China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated on the 22nd that the disposal of nuclear polluted water in Fukushima is related to the global marine environment and the public health of Pacific Rim countries, and is by no means a private matter of Japan. China once again urges Japan to earnestly fulfill its due international obligations, dispose of nuclear polluted water in a scientific, open, transparent and safe way, and stop pushing the plan of discharging the sea. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China emphasizes that before full consultation and agreement are reached with stakeholders and relevant international institutions, shall not start the discharge of nuclear polluted water into the sea without authorization. If Japan insists on putting its own self-interest above the international public interest and taking a dangerous step, it will pay the price for its irresponsible behavior and leave a historical stain.

News recommendation reading

Just now! Jacky Cheung confirmed! These last two days

The temperature rises and the sun goes online.

Are there many friends?

Ready to go out and enjoy the flowers?

Pay attention to the friends who plan to travel tomorrow!

The weather in Jiangxi is going to reverse again

It’s raining hard!

A new round of rainy weather is online again.

According to the China Weather Network,

The latest precipitation forecast shows that

Extensive rainfall

Will once again affect Jiangxi

Tomorrow (this Sunday)

It will rain all over Jiangxi.

Among them, there is moderate rain in central Jiangxi and southern Jiangxi

There are also heavy rains in some areas.

So here comes the question

How long will this rain last?

The temperature difference is 21℃! It rained for six consecutive days.

The weather in Jiangxi is too exciting next.

According to the meteorological department of Jiangxi province

The latest forecast released shows that

The following week

Many places in the province will be maintained.

Rainy, rainy, rainy weather

Take Yichun weather as an example.

start from tomorrow

The following week

It rained for six days.

besides

Pingxiang and Xinyu.

It will also enter the empty window period of "sunshine"

Rain, rain, rain.

Even more exciting is that

By the end of this month,

The weather in Jiangxi once again

Enter crazy mode

According to the latest data from the Central Meteorological Observatory

March 23

The highest temperature in Jiujiang is 27℃

The lowest temperature is only 6℃

The temperature difference is as high as 21℃!

So

Go out during this time

Everyone still wants it.

Take "onion dressing"

Do a good job of daily warmth.

Go out and prepare an umbrella.

Specific weather conditions

Two days after tomorrow

There is a precipitation weather process in the whole province

Among them, there will be light rain to moderate rain on cloudy days in central Jiangxi and southern Jiangxi tomorrow.

There is heavy rain in some areas.

Cloudy days turn to light rain in northern Jiangxi

the day after tomorrow

Cloudy to sunny in northwest Jiangxi

The rain stopped and turned cloudy in other parts of the province.

During the day from 12th to 13th.

The whole province is sunny to cloudy

It is partly foggy in the morning.

13th night-14th

The whole province turns cloudy to cloudy with light rain.

Among them, there are moderate to heavy rains in parts of central Jiangxi and southern Jiangxi.

15-16

There was a precipitation process in the whole province

There is moderate to heavy rain in some areas.

17th

It stopped raining and turned cloudy.

18th-19th

Cloudy to sunny days in the whole province

It is partly foggy in the morning.

The main cities and scenic spots in the west of Jiangxi Province

Seven-day weather forecast

Original title: "Heavy rain! The temperature difference is 21℃! The weather in Jiangxi is too exciting next.

Read the original text

In the second leg of the semi-final of the Champions League, Real Madrid was defeated by Manchester City 4-0. This game also proves Manchester City’s leading edge in the depth of the lineup. Alvarez has attracted the attention of Real Madrid, and they hope to strengthen themselves and attack the Champions League champion again next season.